39
5, p. 533-543, 2004.
18- POLING, R A method of finishing the cclusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.,
St. Louis, v. 115, n. 5, p. 476-487, may. 1999.
19- RICHMOND, S. et al. The development of the PAR index (Peer Asessment Rating):
realibility and validity. Eur. J. Orthod., Oxford, v. 14, n. 2, p. 125-39, Apr. 1992.
20- RICHMOND, S.; DANIELS, C.P. International comparisons of professional assessment
in orthodontics: Part 1 – Treatment need. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., Saint Louis,
v. 113, n. 2, p. 180-85, Feb. 1998.
21- RICHMOND, S.; DANIELS, C.P. International comparisons of professional assessment
in orthodontics: Part 2 – Treatment outcome. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., Saint
Louis, v. 113, n. 3, p. 324-28, Mar. 1998.
22- SONDHI, A. Anterior interferences: their impact on anterior inclination and orthodontic
finishing procedures. Semin. Orthod., Philadelphia, v. 9, n. 3, p. 204-215, sept. 2003.
23- SONDHI, A. The implication of Bracket Seletion and Bracket Placement on Finishing
details. Semin Orthod, Philadelphia, v. 9, n. 3, p. 155-164, sept. 2003.
24- SUMMERS, C. The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal
disorders. Am. J. Orthod., Saint Louis, v. 59, n. 6, p. 552-66, June 1971.
25- SVEDSTRÖM-ORISTO, A. et al. Morphological, functional and aesthetic criteria of
acceptable mature occlusion. Eur. J. Orthod, Oxford, v. 23, p. 373-381, 2001.
26- TAHIR, E.; SADOWSKY, C.; SCHNEIDER, B.J. An assessment of treatment outcome in
American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., Saint Louis, v.
111, n. 3, p. 335-42, Mar., 1997.
27- TANG, E.L.K.; WEI, S.H.Y. Recording and Measuring malocclusion a rewiew of the
literature. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., St. Louis, v. 103, n. 4, p. 344-351, 1993.