Excerpt from
On the Relationship of Theory to Practice in Political Right
Immanuel Kant
1792
Man's freedom as a human being, as a principle for the constitution of a
commonwealth, can be expressed in the following formula. No-one can
compel me to be happy in accordance with his conception of the welfare
of others, for each may seek his happiness in whatever way he sees fit,
so long as he does not infringe upon the freedom of others to pursue a
similar end which can be reconciled with the freedom of everyone else
within a workable general law — i. e., he must accord to others the same
right as he enjoys himself. A government might be established on the
principle of benevolence towards the people, like that of a father
towards his children. Under such a paternal government, the subjects, as
immature children who cannot distinguish what is truly useful or harmful
to themselves, would be obliged to behave purely passively and to rely
upon the judgment of the head of state as to how they ought to be happy,
and upon his kindness in willing their happiness at all. Such a
government is the greatest conceivable despotism, i. e. , a constitution
which suspends the entire freedom of its subjects, who thenceforth have
no rights whatsoever. The only conceivable government for men who are
capable of possessing rights, even if the ruler is benevolent, is not a
paternal but a patriotic government. A patriotic attitude is one where
everyone in the state, not excepting its head, regards the commonwealth
as a maternal womb, or the land as the paternal ground from which he
himself sprang and which he must leave to his descendants as a treasured
pledge. Each regards himself as authorized to protect the rights of the
commonwealth by laws of the general will, but not to submit it to his
personal use at his own absolute pleasure. This right of freedom belongs
to each member of the commonwealth as a human being, in so far as each
is a being capable of possessing rights.